The Fall Of The Roman Empire Wasn't Quite As Bleak As Is Often Suggested

In 476 CE, the last Roman emperor was deposed and allowed to live out his days peacefully as the barbarian king Odoacer took pity on the young lad and didn't see him as a threat. What caused the once-mighty empire to fall is one of the most-studied questions in all of history. From Edward Gibbon's 18th-century classic, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, to the present day, scholars continue to debate how the western portion of the Roman Empire ceased to be. The post-Roman era is often called the Dark Ages, because without the guiding light of Roman civilization, the lands once under Roman rule regressed toward barbarism and mysticism. This interpretation is largely an invention of later writers who saw the Romans as the pinnacle of civilization; the truth isn't quite so simple. A few key innovations were lost to the ages, but the so-called Dark Ages weren't actually all that dark. It wasn't even all that long before Rome once again emerged as Europe's key city, this time as the seat of the Catholic Church. Innovations in agriculture and a more agreeable climate meant that even the less-fertile regions of northern Europe significantly increased their food production. Islamic scholars greatly advanced the studies of engineering, mathematics, and science, while the reign of Charlemagne the Great had a profound impact on European art, culture, and literature.









